Vexatious Litigation

As confirmed in Espinoza v. The Napanee Beaver Limited, Mustafa v. Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Chmurzewski v. Natural Touch Rehabilitation Center, the death of mother or mother-in-law constitutes extraordinary circumstances. As such, I request that our initial request be immediately granted...

How do you deal with a lawyer who thinks she's the Crown Counsel (district attorney) without suing her firm for her Tortious Interference and general stupidity?

I've made certain to carbon-copy his associate Joe Hoffer, because as the Ontario Law Society Chair (so alleged according to Cohen Highley LLP) he's probably in the best position to tell his associate, the guy across the hall, not to breach protocol by enabling their client to go after this tenant with vexatious litigation utilizing fraudulent testimony, right?

Enclosed is a copy of this tenant's letter to the lawyer for Medallion Corporation and their complaint about definitively NOT the fact that the Tenant cannot, or consequent ideological or other exemption choose not to, wear a mask or acceptable face covering such as a muzzle or plastic bag.

What do you do if you want to shake down and harass your tenants with vexatious litigation like shakedown with Notice to End Your Tenancy forms? What about if you want to deniably harass and evict a person who does not wear a mask or acceptable face covering, like good little peasant?

The question of whether Canadian lawyers ought to be trusted to govern themselves has been repeatedly raised..